Fungicide & Spray Decision Database
Ranks fungicides for stripe rust
Pick your crop and disease and get efficacy-ranked products with the FRAC group, label rate range and pre-harvest interval — plus a resistance-rotation check against your last spray. Starts from the disease, not a chemical list.
Pick your crop & disease
Always confirm rate, PHI and registration on your own product label — it is the legal authority.
Next: spray Prothioconazole + tebuconazole at 4–5.7 fl oz/acre (FRAC 3); then your next spray must come from a different FRAC group, and stop spraying at least 30 days before harvest.
Efficacy on the 0–4 land-grant scale (FRAC Code List 2024 + Crop Protection Network efficacy tables). Rates/PHI are representative U.S. label values — confirm your label.
Fungicide decision — key facts
- Efficacy scale
- 0–4 land-grant (4 = excellent)
- FRAC 11
- QoI strobilurin — high risk, rotate
- FRAC 7
- SDHI — high risk, rotate
- FRAC 3
- DMI triazole — medium risk
- Multi-site anchors
- mancozeb (M03), chlorothalonil (M05), copper (M01)
- Rotation rule
- change FRAC group every spray
- PHI
- days from last spray to harvest
- Privacy
- Runs in your browser; nothing uploaded
Start from the disease, not a list of chemicals
Most spray tools hand you a calibration or a dilution and assume you already know which product to load. The real first decision is harder: of all the fungicides labelled for this disease on this crop, which one actually works, fits your resistance rotation, and lets you harvest on time? This database answers exactly that — it filters the crop–disease–product registry, ranks by published efficacy, and checks the mode of action against your last spray.
Every product carries its FRAC code (the mode-of-action group), an efficacy rating on the land-grant 0–4 scale, a label rate range, and a pre-harvest interval. Single-site groups like QoI (11), SDHI (7) and DMI (3) are powerful but at higher resistance risk and must be rotated; multi-site protectants like mancozeb and chlorothalonil are low-risk anchors. The result is a spray plan you can defend agronomically and on the label.
Crop–disease–fungicide reference table
44 rows across 7 crops. Efficacy on the 0–4 land-grant scale; rate ranges and PHI are representative U.S. label values — confirm your own label.
| Crop | Disease | Product (active) | FRAC | Effic. | Rate | PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | Stripe rust | Prothioconazole + tebuconazole | 3 | 4/4 | 4–5.7 fl oz/acre | 30 d |
| Stripe rust | Pyraclostrobin | 11 | 3/4 | 6–9 fl oz/acre | 40 d | |
| Stripe rust | Tebuconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 3–4 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Fusarium head blight | Prothioconazole + tebuconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 4–5 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Fusarium head blight | Metconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 4–6 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Septoria leaf blotch | Fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin | 7 | 4/4 | 4–8 fl oz/acre | 40 d | |
| Septoria leaf blotch | Prothioconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 5–5.7 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Powdery mildew | Tebuconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 3–4 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Corn | Gray leaf spot | Pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad | 11 | 4/4 | 7–8 fl oz/acre | 7 d |
| Gray leaf spot | Azoxystrobin + propiconazole | 11 | 4/4 | 7–14 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Gray leaf spot | Propiconazole | 3 | 2/4 | 4–4 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Northern corn leaf blight | Pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad + propiconazole | 7 | 4/4 | 13.7–20.5 fl oz/acre | 21 d | |
| Northern corn leaf blight | Azoxystrobin + propiconazole | 11 | 3/4 | 7–14 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Southern rust | Pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad | 11 | 4/4 | 7–8 fl oz/acre | 7 d | |
| Southern rust | Propiconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 4–4 fl oz/acre | 30 d | |
| Tar spot | Pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad + propiconazole | 7 | 3/4 | 13.7–20.5 fl oz/acre | 21 d | |
| Soybean | Frogeye leaf spot | Pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad | 7 | 4/4 | 6–12 fl oz/acre | 21 d |
| Frogeye leaf spot | Prothioconazole + trifloxystrobin | 3 | 4/4 | 4–5 fl oz/acre | 21 d | |
| Frogeye leaf spot | Azoxystrobin | 11 | 2/4 | 6–15.5 fl oz/acre | 14 d | |
| Asian soybean rust | Prothioconazole + trifloxystrobin | 3 | 4/4 | 4–5 fl oz/acre | 21 d | |
| Asian soybean rust | Tebuconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 4–6 fl oz/acre | 21 d | |
| White mold (Sclerotinia) | Boscalid | 7 | 3/4 | 4–8 oz/acre | 30 d | |
| White mold (Sclerotinia) | Picoxystrobin | 11 | 2/4 | 12–24 fl oz/acre | 21 d | |
| Tomato | Early blight | Chlorothalonil | M05 | 3/4 | 1.4–2.7 pt/acre | 0 d |
| Early blight | Difenoconazole + cyprodinil | 3 | 4/4 | 5–7 fl oz/acre | 0 d | |
| Early blight | Mancozeb | M03 | 3/4 | 1.5–2 lb/acre | 5 d | |
| Late blight | Mandipropamid | 40 | 4/4 | 5.5–8 fl oz/acre | 4 d | |
| Late blight | Chlorothalonil | M05 | 3/4 | 1.4–2.7 pt/acre | 0 d | |
| Septoria leaf spot | Chlorothalonil | M05 | 3/4 | 1.4–2.7 pt/acre | 0 d | |
| Bacterial spot | Copper hydroxide | M01 | 2/4 | 1–2 lb/acre | 0 d | |
| Potato | Late blight | Mandipropamid | 40 | 4/4 | 6–8 fl oz/acre | 14 d |
| Late blight | Mancozeb | M03 | 3/4 | 1.5–2 lb/acre | 14 d | |
| Early blight | Pyraclostrobin + boscalid | 7 | 4/4 | 7–14 fl oz/acre | 7 d | |
| Early blight | Chlorothalonil | M05 | 3/4 | 1.5–2 pt/acre | 7 d | |
| Grape | Powdery mildew | Quinoxyfen | 13 | 4/4 | 3–4 fl oz/acre | 21 d |
| Powdery mildew | Myclobutanil | 3 | 3/4 | 4–5 oz/acre | 14 d | |
| Downy mildew | Mandipropamid | 40 | 4/4 | 5.5–8 fl oz/acre | 14 d | |
| Downy mildew | Copper hydroxide | M01 | 3/4 | 1–2 lb/acre | 0 d | |
| Botrytis bunch rot | Cyprodinil + fludioxonil | 9 | 4/4 | 8–14 oz/acre | 7 d | |
| Botrytis bunch rot | Fenhexamid | 17 | 3/4 | 1–1.5 lb/acre | 0 d | |
| Rice | Blast | Azoxystrobin | 11 | 4/4 | 12–15.5 fl oz/acre | 28 d |
| Blast | Tricyclazole | 16.1 | 4/4 | 0.5–0.75 kg/ha | 21 d | |
| Sheath blight | Azoxystrobin + difenoconazole | 11 | 4/4 | 14–18 fl oz/acre | 28 d | |
| Sheath blight | Hexaconazole | 3 | 3/4 | 1–2 L/ha | 30 d |
FRAC mode-of-action groups in this database
| FRAC | Mode of action | Example | Risk | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MBC (benzimidazoles) | thiophanate-methyl | high | single-site |
| 3 | DMI (triazoles) | tebuconazole | medium | single-site |
| 7 | SDHI | fluxapyroxad | high | single-site |
| 9 | Anilinopyrimidine (AP) | cyprodinil | medium | single-site |
| 11 | QoI (strobilurin) | azoxystrobin | high | single-site |
| 12 | Phenylpyrrole (PP) | fludioxonil | low | single-site |
| 40 | CAA (carboxylic acid amide) | mandipropamid | medium | single-site |
| M01 | Inorganic (copper) | copper hydroxide | low | multi-site |
| M03 | Dithiocarbamate | mancozeb | low | multi-site |
| M05 | Chloronitrile | chlorothalonil | low | multi-site |
| P07 | Phosphonate (host defence) | potassium phosphite | low | multi-site |
How to use it — five steps
- 1Select the crop
Choose what you are protecting — wheat, corn, soybean, tomato, potato, grape or rice.
- 2Select the disease
The product list re-ranks to that exact crop–disease pairing.
- 3Enter your last FRAC group
Tell the tool the mode of action you sprayed last; the rotation light updates.
- 4Take the top option
It is the highest-efficacy, rotation-safe, earliest-to-harvest product.
- 5Apply the rate and respect the PHI
Spray within the labelled rate range and stop spraying the PHI days before harvest.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does this fungicide decision database pick the best product?+
You choose the crop and the disease, and the tool filters the registry to the products labelled for that exact crop–disease pairing. It then ranks them by their land-grant efficacy rating on the 0–4 scale (4 = very good/excellent), breaking ties first by avoiding a repeat of your last FRAC mode of action and then by the shortest pre-harvest interval. The top of the list is the highest-efficacy, rotation-friendly, earliest-to-harvest option.
What is a FRAC group and why does it matter?+
FRAC is the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee, which assigns every fungicide a numeric code by its mode of action — for example QoI strobilurins are FRAC 11, SDHIs are FRAC 7, DMI triazoles are FRAC 3. Fungi develop resistance to a single mode of action fast if it is used repeatedly, so the rule is to rotate FRAC groups between sprays. The tool flags when your top pick repeats the FRAC group you sprayed last.
What is the pre-harvest interval (PHI)?+
The PHI is the minimum number of days that must pass between the last fungicide application and harvest, set on the product label so residues fall to legal limits. It varies widely — chlorothalonil on tomato can be 0 days while a strobilurin on wheat may be 40 days. The tool shows each product's PHI and reports the earliest harvest date the top pick allows.
Which fungicide is best for stripe rust on wheat?+
In this database the highest-rated wheat stripe-rust option is a prothioconazole + tebuconazole premix (FRAC 3, DMI triazoles) at about 4.0–5.7 fl oz/acre, efficacy 4/4, with a 30-day PHI. A pyraclostrobin strobilurin (FRAC 11) rates 3/4. Rotate the triazole and strobilurin modes of action across sprays rather than repeating either.
What fungicide should I use for late blight on tomato or potato?+
Late blight is an oomycete, not a true fungus, so CAA chemistry like mandipropamid (FRAC 40, efficacy 4/4) is the strongest rated option — about 5.5–8 fl oz/acre on tomato with a 4-day PHI. Anchor or alternate it with a multi-site protectant such as chlorothalonil (FRAC M05) or mancozeb (FRAC M03), which carry very low resistance risk.
What is the difference between single-site and multi-site fungicides?+
Single-site fungicides (FRAC 3, 7, 11 and similar) hit one target in the pathogen, so they are powerful but at high or medium resistance risk — they must be rotated. Multi-site protectants such as mancozeb (M03), chlorothalonil (M05) and copper (M01) attack many sites at once, are at very low resistance risk, and are ideal anchors or tank-mix partners to protect the single-site products.
How is fungicide efficacy rated 0 to 4?+
Land-grant universities publish consensus efficacy tables using a 0–4 scale: 0 means not effective or not labelled, 1 poor, 2 fair, 3 good, and 4 very good to excellent. The ratings reflect field-trial performance against each specific disease, which is why the same active ingredient can rate 4 on one disease and 2 on another. This tool uses those ratings to order the options.
Can I just spray the same fungicide every time it works?+
No — that is the fastest way to lose the product. Repeated use of one mode of action selects for resistant strains of the pathogen, and high-risk groups like QoI (11) and SDHI (7) have already failed on several diseases where they were over-used. Rotate FRAC groups every spray and keep a multi-site protectant in the program; the tool's rotation light warns when your pick repeats your last group.
Does a higher rate always mean better control?+
Within the labelled range a higher rate can lengthen protection on heavy disease pressure, but exceeding the label is illegal and does not overcome resistance — a resistant population is unaffected by more of the same chemistry. The right move under pressure is the correct labelled rate of an effective mode of action, applied with good coverage and timing, then rotated. Use the rate range shown as your legal envelope.
Is the spray plan from this tool a substitute for the product label?+
No. The label is the legal authority for crop registration, rate, PHI, re-entry interval and use restrictions, and it can differ by region and formulation. This database gives efficacy-based selection guidance from FRAC codes and land-grant tables to help you choose, but you must confirm every figure against the actual label you hold before spraying.
How do I read the resistance-rotation check?+
Set the FRAC group you sprayed last in the input. The tool then marks each product with a coloured light: green means a different mode of action (safe to rotate to), amber means the same chemical family, and red means it repeats your last FRAC group. If the top pick lights red, choose the best green-lit option below it instead — that is the rotation working in your favour.