Skip to content
Dependency × concentration × irreplaceability · stockpile gaps

Material Dependency Analyzer

Gallium, neon, rare earths — a material is dangerous only when heavy dependence, concentrated supply and no substitute all align. Score your critical-materials basket and find the chokepoints.

01 · Materials & supply factors
MaterialDepend %Top country %Stock wkSubstit. 0–1
38Portfolio risk
2 thin stockpiles
Per-material chokepoint analysis ↓
02 · Deep analysis

Critical-materials console

Risk by material (dependency × concentration × irreplaceability)
Gallium
71 · 4wk
Neon gas
29 · 8wk
High-purity silicon
29 · 16wk
Tungsten
21 · 20wk

⚠ = stockpile below 12-week buffer. The longest bar is your top chokepoint — where mitigation pays most.

Portfolio risk
38 / 100
Top chokepoint
Gallium
Materials
4
Thin stockpiles
2
< 12 weeks
Materials verdict

Your basket scores 38/100 portfolio risk, driven by Gallium — high dependency on a concentrated, hard-to-substitute material. 2 materials have a stockpile under 12 weeks.

Fast fix: build strategic reserves for thin-stockpile chokepoints. Durable fix: substitution R&D and source diversification for the least-substitutable, most-concentrated materials — that permanently lowers what stockpiles only defer.

Model source-country disruption odds in China Risk; check export-control exposure in Export Control Checker.

Why it matters

Why raw inputs are a hidden risk

Risk = dependency × concentration × irreplaceability

A material is dangerous when you depend on it heavily, its supply is geographically concentrated, and there's no substitute. All three must align — a concentrated material you barely use, or can swap out, is low risk.

Some inputs are near-monopolies

Gallium, certain rare earths and specialty gases come overwhelmingly from one country. Export controls on these have already been used as leverage — a single policy decision upstream can choke supply with no quick alternative.

Stockpiles buy reaction time

For materials with no fast substitute, inventory is the only bridge. A thin stockpile (weeks) on a near-monopoly material is acute exposure; building strategic reserves is the standard mitigation while alternatives are developed.

Substitution is the long-game fix

The durable answer is reducing irreplaceability — qualifying alternative materials, redesigning to avoid the scarce input, or developing new sources. It's slow, but it permanently lowers the risk that stockpiles only defer.

Field notes

The chokepoints below the chips

Supply-chain attention naturally lands on the chips themselves and the fabs that make them, but some of the most acute vulnerabilities sit further upstream, in the raw materials that the whole industry quietly depends on. Specialty gases like neon, metals like gallium and germanium, rare earths, high-purity silicon — these are the inputs without which fabs simply stop, and several of them come overwhelmingly from a single country. When that country decides to impose export controls, as has already happened, a single policy choice can choke supply with no quick alternative.

What makes a material genuinely dangerous is the coincidence of three things. You have to depend on it heavily, its supply has to be concentrated in few hands, and there has to be no ready substitute. Any one of these alone is manageable: a concentrated material you barely use doesn't hurt you, and one you can swap out has a built-in off-ramp even if it's a near-monopoly. It's only when heavy dependence, concentrated supply and irreplaceability all align that you have a true chokepoint — which is why triage means looking at the product of all three, not any single alarming statistic.

The mitigations come in two timeframes. Stockpiles are the fast bridge: for a material with no near-term substitute, weeks of inventory is acute exposure and months buy time to react, which is exactly why governments and firms hold strategic reserves of critical materials. But stockpiles only defer the problem. The durable fix is reducing irreplaceability itself — qualifying alternative materials, redesigning to avoid the scarce input, developing new sources and new supplier geographies. That work is slow and expensive, but it permanently lowers a risk that reserves can only postpone.

Use this analyzer to score your basket on all four drivers, find the materials where dependence, concentration and irreplaceability converge, and flag thin stockpiles for immediate reserve-building while substitution work proceeds. Then assess the disruption likelihood of the source countries in the China Risk calculator and your exposure to material and product export controls in the Export Control Checker.

Material Dependency FAQs

Have more questions? Contact us

Trusted by Critical-Materials Teams

4.8
Based on 2,610 reviews

The dependency × concentration × irreplaceability formula is exactly right — it stops people panicking over a concentrated material we can substitute while ignoring an irreplaceable one. Gallium lighting up as our top risk, with its thin stockpile flagged, drove our reserve-building decision. The best critical-materials triage tool I've used.

D
Dr. Helena Brandt
Critical materials lead
June 12, 2026

Separating the fast fix (stockpile) from the durable fix (substitution R&D) is the framing our strategy needed. After the gallium/germanium export controls this is exactly the analysis leadership asked for. Pairs naturally with the China and geopolitical tools for the source-country side. Indispensable.

M
Marcus Lindgren
Procurement / commodities
May 20, 2026

Clean per-material risk with the stockpile flag and portfolio roll-up. Running our rare-earth basket made the magnet-material exposure undeniable. Would love price-volatility as a factor, but the core concentration/substitution logic captures the structural risk well. Genuinely useful.

A
Aiko Tanaka
Supply chain strategy
April 2, 2026

Editable materials with all four risk drivers, instant portfolio score and thin-stockpile count — a full critical-materials review in minutes. The point that substitution permanently lowers what stockpiles only defer reframed our R&D priorities. Feeds straight into our geopolitical exposure work. Fast and clear.

C
Carlos Ferreira
Resilience analyst
January 11, 2026

Love using our calculator?

Connected instruments

Related tools

Similar Calculators

More tools in the same category

Chip Supply Risk Analyzer

Evaluate semiconductor supply chain vulnerabilities with n-tier supplier mapping, concentration-risk quantification, and disruption-scenario simulation. Integrates real-time geopolitical event feeds, port-congestion data, and fab-earthquake risk models for proactive risk mitigation.

Geopolitical Risk Engine

Assess regional and political manufacturing risks with AI-powered news analysis, trade-policy tracking, and scenario-planning for tariff, sanction, and conflict impacts. Models Taiwan Strait, South China Sea, and Red Sea disruption scenarios with supply-chain rerouting recommendations.

Export Control Checker

Check export restrictions and compliance requirements across BIS Entity List, EAR, ITAR, and allied-country regulations with automated classification and license-determination workflows. Supports product-technology mapping, end-user screening, and audit-trail generation for trade compliance.

Sanctions Exposure Scanner

Identify sanctions-related risks in supplier networks, customer bases, and investment portfolios with automated entity-list matching, ownership-chain tracing, and red-flag detection. Supports OFAC, EU, UN, and UK sanctions regimes with real-time alert and remediation workflows.

Foundry Comparison Engine

Compare semiconductor manufacturing providers across technology offerings, capacity availability, pricing, and geopolitical risk with node-roadmap alignment and yield benchmarking. Supports TSMC, Samsung, Intel Foundry, GlobalFoundries, SMIC, and emerging players with multi-criteria decision analysis.

China Risk Calculator

Assess China-related supply chain exposure with dual-use technology classification, domestic-substitution tracking, and export-control impact quantification. Models decoupling scenarios, friend-shoring alternatives, and cost-of-exit analysis for supply-chain restructuring decisions.

Often Used Together

Complementary tools for complete analysis

Learn More

Related Articles

Dive deeper with our expert guides and tutorials related to Material Dependency Analyzer

Loading articles...

risk = dependency% × top-country% × (1 − substitutability) · stockpile flag < 12 weeks · Last reviewed: 2026-06